| Citation: | KANG K，WANG Z P，FANG K，et al. Impact of IFB uncertainty on dual-frequency code carrier divergence monitoring[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics，2023，49（9）：2463-2472 （in Chinese） doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2021.0649
|
Code carrier divergence (CCD) monitor is one of the integrity monitors introduced by ground-based augmentation systems (GBAS), which is used to monitor the inconsistency between code pseudorange and carrier phase observations. Dual-frequency smoothing technology changes the test statistics and other parameters of CCD monitor, which affect the monitoring performance. Considering the inter-frequency bias (IFB) introduced in dual-frequency GBAS, the impact of IFB uncertainty on the dual-frequency CCD monitoring is analyzed based on the dual-frequency observation data of BDS B1I and B3I signals. The results show that under the influence of IFB uncertainty, the threshold of the monitor increases by 26.1%, resulting in a significant increase of the probability of missed detection (PMD) in the case of CCD fault. And the minimum detectable fault increases by 26.9%, which means a decrease in the sensitivity of the monitor. Meanwhile, the probability of the loss of integrity in the worst case increases from less than 10−14 to nearly 10−8, and the delay introduced by the airborne to meet the PMD requirement is larger, resulting in a slower response of CCD monitor and impacts the integrity of dual-frequency GBAS.
| [1] |
谢钢. GPS原理与接收机设计[M]. 北京: 电子工业出版社, 2017.
XIE G. Principles of GPS and receiver design[M]. Beijing: Publishing House of Electronics Industry, 2017 (in Chinese).
|
| [2] |
Radio Technical Commission for Aeronautics (RTCA) Special Committee 159 (SC-159). Minimum operational performance standards for GPS local area augmentation system airborne equipment: DO-253C[S]. Washington, D. C. : RTCA, 2008.
|
| [3] |
Radio Technical Commission for Aeronautics (RTCA) Special Committee 159 (SC-159). Minimum operational performance standards for GPS local area augmentation system airborne Equipment: DO-253D[S]. Washington, D. C. : RTCA, 2017.
|
| [4] |
International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) Navigation Systems Panel (NSP). GBAS CAT II/III development baseline SARPs[S]. Montreal: ICAO, 2010.
|
| [5] |
XIE G. Optimal on-airport monitoring of the integrity of GPS-based landing systems[D]. Stanford: Stanford University, 2004.
|
| [6] |
SIMILI D V, PERVAN B. Code-carrier divergence monitoring for the GPS local area augmentation system[C]// 2006 IEEE/ION Position, Location, and Navigation Symposium. Piscataway: IEEE Press, 2006.
|
| [7] |
European Organization for Civil Aviation Equipment (EUROCAE). Minimum operational performance specification for global navigation satellite ground based augmentation system ground equipment to support category I operations: ED-114A[S]. SaintDenis: EUROCAE, 2013.
|
| [8] |
KONNO H. Dual-frequency smoothing for CAT III LAAS performance assessment considering ionosphere anomalies[C]//Proceedings of the 20th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of The Institute of Navigation (ION GNSS 2007). Fort Worth: The Institute of Navigation, 2007: 424-437.
|
| [9] |
SUNG Y T, LIN Y W, YEH S J, et al. A dual-frequency ground based augmentation system prototype for GPS and BDS[C]// Proceedings of the 32nd International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of the Institute of Navigation (ION GNSS 2019). Fort Worth: The Institute of Navigation, 2019: 628-636.
|
| [10] |
CIRCIU M S, MEURER M, FELUX M, et al. Evaluation of GPS L5 and Galileo E1 and E5a performance for future multifrequency and multiconstellation GBAS[J]. Navigation, 2017, 64(1): 149-163. doi: 10.1002/navi.181
|
| [11] |
FELUX M, CIRCIU M, BELABBAS B, et al. Concept for a dual frequency dual constellation GBAS[C]// Proceedings of the 28th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of the Institute of Navigation (ION GNSS 2015). Fort Worth: The Institute of Navigation, 2015: 1519-1525.
|
| [12] |
KONNO H, PULLEN S, RIFE J, et al. Ionosphere monitoring methodology for hybrid dual-frequency LAAS[C]// Proceedings of the 19th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of The Institute of Navigation (ION GNSS 2006). Fort Worth: The Institute of Navigation, 2006: 409-424.
|
| [13] |
KONNO H, PULLEN S, RIFE J, et al. Evaluation of two types of dual-frequency differential GPS techniques under anomalous ionosphere conditions[C]// Proceedings of the 2006 National Technical Meeting of the Institute of Navigation. Fort Worth: The Institute of Navigation, 2006: 735-747.
|
| [14] |
JIANG Y P, MILNER C, MACABIAU C. Code carrier divergence monitoring for dual-frequency GBAS[J]. GPS Solutions, 2017, 21(2): 769-781. doi: 10.1007/s10291-016-0567-4
|
| [15] |
BAO Y D, LI J, LIU H N. Extraction and analysis of DCB daily variation based on single station dual-frequency observations[C]//Proceedings of the 9th China Satellite Navigation Academic Annual Conference. Berlin: Springer, 2018.
|
| [16] |
MA G, MARUYAMA T. Derivation of TEC and estimation of instrumental biases from GEONET in Japan[J]. Annales Geophysicae, 2003, 21(10): 2083-2093. doi: 10.5194/angeo-21-2083-2003
|
| [17] |
HOLASCHUTZ D, BISHOP R H, HARRIS R B, et al. Inter-frequency bias estimation for the GPS monitor station network[C]// International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of the Institute of Navigation (ION GNSS 2008). Savannah: The Institute of Navigation, 2008: 2405-2415.
|
| [18] |
LI Z S, YUAN Y B, LI H, et al. Two-step method for the determination of the differential code biases of COMPASS satellites[J]. Journal of Geodesy, 2012, 86(11): 1059-1076. doi: 10.1007/s00190-012-0565-4
|
| [19] |
LIU Y H, LI X H, ZHANG H J, et al. Calculation and accuracy evaluation of TGD from IFB for BDS[J]. GPS Solutions, 2016, 20(3): 461-471. doi: 10.1007/s10291-015-0454-4
|
| [20] |
MURPHY T, GEREN P, PANKASKIE T. GPS antenna group delay variation induced errors in a GNSS based precision approach and landing systems[C]// 20th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division. Fort Worth: The Institute of Navigation, 2007: 2974-2989.
|
| [21] |
BEER S, WANNINGER L, HEBELBANTH A. Estimation of absolute GNSS satellite antenna group delay variations based on those of absolute receiver antenna group delays[J]. GPS Solutions, 2021, 25(3): 1-10.
|
| [22] |
THOMAS Z. A new evaluation of maximum allowable errors and missed detection probabilities for LAAS ranging source monitors[C]// Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of The Institute of Navigation and CIGTF 21st Guidance Test Symposium (2002). Fort Worth: The Institute of Navigation, 2002: 187-194.
|
Figures(11) / Tables(4)
Copyright © Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics
Address: Editorial Department of Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 37 Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing Post Code: 100191 Email: jbuaa@cqjj8.com
Supported by:
Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd.
DownLoad:
