Volume 46 Issue 7
Jul.  2020
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
YAN Yan, ZHANG Jin, TANG Qiuyuet al. Game analysis of airline freight alliance based on improved prospect theory[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2020, 46(7): 1247-1257. doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2019.0468(in Chinese)
Citation: YAN Yan, ZHANG Jin, TANG Qiuyuet al. Game analysis of airline freight alliance based on improved prospect theory[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2020, 46(7): 1247-1257. doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2019.0468(in Chinese)

Game analysis of airline freight alliance based on improved prospect theory

doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2019.0468
Funds:

National Social Science Fund of China 17XGL013

More Information
  • Corresponding author: ZHANG Jin. E-mail:zhjswjtu@home.swjtu.edu.cn
  • Received Date: 02 Sep 2019
  • Accepted Date: 03 Jan 2020
  • Publish Date: 20 Jul 2020
  • The application of the airline freight alliance helps the airline's business operations, and the airlines improve the quality of service through low operating costs, so that users get a greater sense of satisfaction. Based on the airline freight alliance, this paper discusses the decision-making of different airlines in the airline freight alliance about the self-operation or outsourcing of air route transport operation. In the model, considering the loss aversion in prospect theory, the improved var function is used to describe the cost loss of airlines. The benefit matrix of both sides of the game is established, and the decision-making process is analyzed by dynamic evolutionary game. The results show that, when the cost coefficient of self-operation allocation is larger, the cost coefficient of outsourcing allocation, the risk loss coefficient and the risk concave-convex coefficient are smaller, the fixed cost is larger, and the unit transportation cost of aircraft is smaller, the yield rate is larger, and S airline should adopt business self-operation if their business volume is larger than other airlines; otherwise, it should outsource its own business. The smaller self-operating cost sharing coefficient and the larger outsourcing cost sharing coefficient, the larger self-operating probability of S airline. The larger the freight volume of S airline, the larger self-operating probability of S airline. The larger self-operating probability of other airlines, the smaller self-operating probability of S airline.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    KOTTAS A T, MADAS M A.Comparative efficiency analysis of major international airlines using data envelopment analysis:Exploring effects of alliance membership and other operational efficiency determinants[J].Journal of Air Transport Management, 2018, 70:1-17.
    [2]
    ALDERIGHI M, GAGGERO A A.Flight cancellations and airline alliances:Empirical evidence from Europe[J].Transportation Research Part E:Logistics and Transportation Review, 2018, 116:90-101.
    [3]
    COBEÑA M, GALLEGO Á, CASANUEVA C.Diversity in airline alliance portfolio configuration[J].Journal of Air Transport Management, 2019, 75:16-26.
    [4]
    LORDAN O, KLOPHAUS R.Measuring the vulnerability of global airline alliances to member exits[J].Transportation Research Procedia, 2017, 25:7-16.
    [5]
    王苗苗.联盟环境下航空公司航线网络优化研究[D].南京: 南京亚洲成人在线一二三四五六区, 2016.

    WANG M M.Research on optimization of airline network in alliance[D].Nanjing: Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2016(in Chinese).
    [6]
    陈征.航空货运联盟的收益共享模型研究[D].北京: 北京理工大学, 2015.

    CHEN Z.A research of revenue sharing model of airline alliance[D].Beijing: Beijing Institute of Technology, 2015(in Chinese).
    [7]
    顾颖菁.航空货运联盟收益管理研究[D].南京: 南京亚洲成人在线一二三四五六区, 2017.

    GU Y J.Research on revenue management of airline alliance[D].Nanjing: Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2017(in Chinese).
    [8]
    顾颖菁, 朱金福.基于议价模型的航空货运联盟动态转让价格研究[J].华东交通大学学报, 2017, 34(3):53-59.

    GU Y J, ZHU J F.Research on transfer price of airline alliance based on bargaining model[J].Journal of East China Jiaotong University, 2017, 34(3):53-59(in Chinese).
    [9]
    丛晓妮, 肖瑶, 李实萍.考虑航空战略联盟风险因素的Shapley值收益分配模型[J].工业工程, 2018, 21(4):75-84.

    CONG X N, XIAO Y, LI S P.A Shapley value revenue distribution model considering risk factors of aviation strategic alliance[J].Industrial Engineering Journal, 2018, 21(4):75-84(in Chinese).
    [10]
    郑士源, 王浣尘.基于动态合作博弈理论的航空货运联盟稳定性[J].系统工程理论与实践, 2009, 29(4):184-192.

    ZHENG S Y, WANG H C.Airline alliance stability based on dynamic cooperative game theory[J].Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2009, 29(4):184-192(in Chinese).
    [11]
    WRIGHT C P, GROENEVELT H, SHUMSKY R A.Dynamic revenue management in airline alliances[J].Transportation Science, 2010, 44(1):15-37.
    [12]
    文军.航空货运联盟形成机理及协调管理中若干问题研究[D].成都: 西南交通大学, 2008.

    WEN J.Research on some issues of the formation mechanism and coordination management about airline alliance[D].Chengdu: Southwest Jiaotong University, 2008(in Chinese).
    [13]
    KIMMS A, ÇETINER D.Approximate nucleolus-based revenue sharing in airline alliances[J].European Journal of Operational Research, 2012, 220(2):510-521.
    [14]
    TOPALOGLU H.A duality based approach for network revenue management in airline alliances[J].Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, 2012, 11(5):500-517. doi: 10.1057/rpm.2012.8
    [15]
    陈福集, 黄亚驹.基于前景理论的商业化网媒行为监管演化博弈分析[J].现代情报, 2017, 37(6):3-8.

    CHEN F J, HUANG Y J.Evolutionary game analysis of commercial network behavior regulation based on prospect theory[J].Journal of Modern Information, 2017, 37(6):3-8(in Chinese).
    [16]
    赵泽斌, 满庆鹏.基于前景理论的重大基础设施工程风险管理行为演化博弈分析[J].系统管理学报, 2018, 27(1):109-117.

    ZHAO Z B, MAN Q P.Evolutionary game analysis of risk management behavior in major infrastructure projects based on prospect theory[J].Journal of Systems & Management, 2018, 27(1):109-117(in Chinese).
    [17]
    付光辉, 董健, 潘欣维.信息传递下的物业行业监管——基于前景理论的演化博弈分析[J].工程管理学报, 2018, 32(5):119-123.

    FU G H, DONG J, PAN X W.The supervision of the property industry under information transmission-evolutionary game analysis based on prospect theory[J].Journal of Engineering Management, 2018, 32(5):119-123(in Chinese).
    [18]
    张在旭, 刘志阳, 马莹莹.政府监管下的企业安全生产行为研究——基于前景理论的演化博弈分析[J].数学的实践与认识, 2018, 48(4):70-78.

    ZHANG Z X, LIU Z Y, MA Y Y.Evolutionary game analysis on safety production behavior supervision of enterprises based on prospect theory[J].Mathematics in Practice and Theory, 2018, 48(4):70-78(in Chinese).
    [19]
    洪巍, 王虎.政府监管下的网络推手与意见领袖合谋行为研究——基于前景理论的演化博弈分析[J].经济与管理, 2019(3):18-25.

    HONG W, WANG H.Research on conspiracy of internet marketer and opinion leader under government regulation[J].Economy and Management, 2019(3):18-25(in Chinese).
    [20]
    吴洁, 吴小桔, 李鹏, 等.基于累积前景理论的联盟企业知识转移演化博弈分析[J].运筹与管理, 2017, 26(3):92-99.

    WU J, WU X J, LI P, et al.Evolutionary game analysis of knowledge transfer in industry alliance based on cumulative prospect theory[J].Operations Research and Management Science, 2017, 26(3):92-99(in Chinese).
    [21]
    TVERSKY A, KAHNEMAN D.Advances in prospect theory:Cumulative representation of uncertainty[J].Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1992, 5(4):297-323. doi: 10.1007-BF00122574/
    [22]
    RIEGER M O, BUI T.Too risk-averse for prospect theory [J].Modern Economy, 2011, 2(4):691-700.
    [23]
    闫妍, 刘永慧, 马啸来, 等.基于政府补贴的城乡配送末端网点博弈分析[J].工业工程与管理, 2018, 23(2):130-137.

    YAN Y, LIU Y H, MA X L, et al.The game theory of terminal distribution network in urban and rural based on government subsidies[J].Industrial Engineering and Management, 2018, 23(2):130-137(in Chinese).
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(8)  / Tables(3)

    Article Metrics

    Article views(756) PDF downloads(101) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return