| Citation: | DU Z M,ZHANG J F,GUI X H. Scheduling optimization for continuous climb and descend operations in busy terminal area[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,2025,51(9):3193-3202 (in Chinese) doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2023.0415 |
Based on the current terminal airspace structure, a novel scheduling method for arrival and departure aircraft based on trajectory optimization, conflict detection, and multi-objective optimization is proposed to assist in continuous climb and descent operations in busy terminal airspace. Firstly, a vertical profile optimization method for continuous climb and descent operations is proposed based on multi-stage optimal control theory and the Gaussian pseudo-spectral method, achieving trajectory optimization for continuous climb and descent operations by cost index. Secondly, according to the wake separation and clearance separation used by the runway operations and the horizontal and vertical separation of air operations, an aircraft conflict detection model is established using Mahalanobis distance. Subsequently, considering the demands of operational units such as air traffic control, airlines, and airports, a multi-objective scheduling model and method with achievable optimization results were proposed for arrival and departure aircraft. Finally, two sets of arrival and departure data from Guangzhou Baiyun Airport during peak hours were selected, multiple interval parameters were set, alternative paths were designed, and case analysis and comparative research were conducted. The results indicate that during peak departure hours, the terminal airspace of Guangzhou Baiyun Airport can achieve continuous climb and descent operations during peak hours. Furthermore, during peak arrival hours, two aircraft cannot be scheduled. Introducing alternative paths can reduce the number of aircraft that cannot be scheduled.
| [1] |
LIU J, ZHANG J F, DAI X M, et al. Research on trajectory generation and optimization in continuous descent operations[C]//Proceedings of the 2018 Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference. AIAA, 2018: 2018-3986.
|
| [2] |
JIN L, CAO Y, SUN D F. Investigation of potential fuel savings due to continuous-descent approach[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2013, 50(3): 807-816. doi: 10.2514/1.C032000
|
| [3] |
DALMAU R. Optimal trajectory management for aircraft descent operations subject to time constraints[D]. Barcelona: Technical University of Catalonia, 2019: 5-6.
|
| [4] |
张军峰, 游录宝, 杨春苇, 等. 基于多目标帝国竞争算法的进场排序与调度[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(6): 324439.
ZHANG J F, YOU L B, YANG C W, et al. Arrival sequencing and scheduling based on multi-objective Imperialist competitive algorithm[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2021, 42(6): 324439(in Chinese).
|
| [5] |
LIANG M, DELAHAYE D, MARECHAL P. Conflict-free arrival and departure trajectory planning for parallel runway with advanced point-merge system[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2018, 95: 207-227. doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2018.07.006
|
| [6] |
杨磊, 李文博, 刘芳子, 等. 柔性空域结构下连续下降航迹多目标优化[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(2): 324157.
YANG L, LI W B, LIU F Z, et al. Multi-objective optimization of continuous descending trajectories in flexible airspace[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2021, 42(2): 324157(in Chinese).
|
| [7] |
HU R, FENG H L, WITLOX F, et al. Airport capacity constraints and air traffic demand in China[J]. Journal of Air Transport Management, 2022, 103: 102251. doi: 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2022.102251
|
| [8] |
SÁEZ R, PRATS X, POLISHCHUK T, et al. Traffic synchronization in terminal airspace to enable continuous descent operations in trombone sequencing and merging procedures: An implementation study for Frankfurt airport[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2020, 121: 102875. doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2020.102875
|
| [9] |
SÁEZ R, POLISHCHUK T, SCHMIDT C, et al. Automated sequencing and merging with dynamic aircraft arrival routes and speed management for continuous descent operations[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2021, 132: 103402. doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2021.103402
|
| [10] |
GUI D D, LE M L, HUANG Z C, et al. Optimal aircraft arrival scheduling with continuous descent operations in busy terminal maneuvering areas[J]. Journal of Air Transport Management, 2023, 107: 102344. doi: 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2022.102344
|
| [11] |
HONG Y, CHOI B, LEE K, et al. Dynamic robust sequencing and scheduling under uncertainty for the point merge system in terminal airspace[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2018, 19(9): 2933-2943. doi: 10.1109/TITS.2017.2766683
|
| [12] |
KAMO S, ROSENOW J, FRICKE H, et al. Robust optimization integrating aircraft trajectory and sequence under weather forecast uncertainty[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2023, 152: 104187. doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2023.104187
|
| [13] |
TORATANI D, WICKRAMASINGHE N K, WESTPHAL J, et al. Feasibility study on applying continuous descent operations in congested airspace with speed control functionality: fixed flight-path angle descent[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2020, 107: 106236. doi: 10.1016/j.ast.2020.106236
|
| [14] |
LIEDER A, BRISKORN D, STOLLETZ R. A dynamic programming approach for the aircraft landing problem with aircraft classes[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2015, 243(1): 61-69. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2014.11.027
|
| [15] |
张军峰, 游录宝, 周铭, 等. 基于点融合系统的多目标进场排序与调度[J]. 北京亚洲成人在线一二三四五六区学报, 2023, 49(1): 66-73.
ZHANG J F, YOU L B, ZHOU M, et al. Multi-objective arrival sequencing and scheduling based on point merge system[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2023, 49(1): 66-73(in Chinese).
|
| [16] |
BENNELL J A, MESGARPOUR M, POTTS C N. Airport runway scheduling[J]. Annals of Operations Research, 2013, 204(1): 249-270. doi: 10.1007/s10479-012-1268-1
|
| [17] |
IKLI S, MANCEL C, MONGEAU M, et al. The aircraft runway scheduling problem: a survey[J]. Computers & Operations Research, 2021, 132: 105336.
|
| [18] |
BENNELL J A, MESGARPOUR M, POTTS C N. Dynamic scheduling of aircraft landings[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2017, 258(1): 315-327. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2016.08.015
|
| [19] |
SAMÀ M, D’ARIANO A, D’ARIANO P, et al. Scheduling models for optimal aircraft traffic control at busy airports: tardiness, priorities, equity and violations considerations[J]. Omega, 2017, 67: 81-98. doi: 10.1016/j.omega.2016.04.003
|
| [20] |
YANG Y C, GAO Z C, HE C. Stochastic terminal flight arrival and departure scheduling problem under performance-based navigation environment[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2020, 119: 102735. doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2020.102735
|
| [21] |
DU Z M, ZHANG J F, KANG B. A data-driven method for arrival sequencing and scheduling problem[J]. Aerospace, 2023, 10(1): 62. doi: 10.3390/aerospace10010062
|
| [22] |
ZHANG J F, LIU J, HU R, et al. Online four-dimensional trajectory prediction method based on aircraft intent updating[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2018, 77: 774-787. doi: 10.1016/j.ast.2018.03.037
|
| [23] |
RAO A V, BENSON D A, DARBY C, et al. Algorithm 902: GPOPS, a MATLAB software for solving multiple-phase optimal control problems using the Gauss Pseudo-spectral method[J]. ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software, 2010, 37(2): 1-39.
|
| [24] |
GILL P E, WONG E, MURRAY W, et al. User's guide for SNOPT version 7.5: software for large-scale nonlinear programming[R]. San Diego: University of California, 2015.
|
| [25] |
GUI X H, ZHANG J F, TANG X M, et al. A data-driven trajectory optimization framework for terminal maneuvering area operations[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2022, 131(1): 108010.
|
| [26] |
ZHANG J F, ZHAO P L, ZHANG Y, et al. Criteria selection and multi-objective optimization of aircraft landing problem[J]. Journal of Air Transport Management, 2020, 82: 101734. doi: 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2019.101734
|